Quantcast

Extra Shirts Do Not Equal Pants NoPants

25 Apr 2010 by uiucnopants, 1 Comment »

She must be compensating with all those layers up top, says the anonymous contributor who caught this nopantster outside of FLB.

She knows about layering. Unfortunately, she needs to apply that idea to her lower body too. Layers are, in fact, a simple and flattering cure to nopants!

The take-home lesson: just because you are wearing 3+ items from your closet does not mean you are wearing pants.

Tags: , ,

One Comment

  1. Alex says:

    Speaking of compensating, something tells me that a mass gag reflex would follow the authors of this blog around town if they wore “no pants.” I’m not one to attribute fashion dislikes to jealousy, but here. . . jesus. Just ’cause you need a thick layer of denim to keep your rolls of transformed Reeces Peanut Butter Cups in check doesn’t mean attractive women shouldn’t be able to wear attractive clothes. Also, “nopantster” isn’t nearly as cute of a word as you think.

Leave a Reply

Follow us!

Follow UIUCnopants! Follow Me! Follow Me!

Search